DOGS TRUST KEEPS UP PRESSURE TO REFORM DANGEROUS DOGS LAWS UK ’s largest dog charity urging for calm over dangerous dogs and focus on ‘deed not breed’ Dogs Trust, the UK ’s largest dog welfare charity, is keeping up pressure on government, policy-makers, media and local authorities to take a balanced approach to tackling dangerous dogs, and not to give in to a knee-jerk response to the events of new year’s day and the tragic death of five-year old Ellie Lawrenson. Dogs Trust’s view is that the Dangerous Dogs Act (DDA) needs urgent review in order to tackle the real problem of aggressive dogs not by definition of breed, but by enforcing effective controls of any dog who shows unwarranted aggression, whatever their breed, and imposing strict conditions on the owners of such dogs. This position has been widely reported in national and regional media, and the charity is now focussing on discussions with central government to push for an urgent but considered review of the DDA, and warning that an emotional and rushed response will simply repeat the mistakes of the original DDA. The charity is also warning that rushing to bring in amnesties for pit bull-type dogs will not tackle the problem of aggressive dogs in the long-term, but could simply mean the destruction of a large number of dogs simply on the basis of their breed, and will also do nothing to tackle the owners who are deliberately encouraging aggression in their dogs. Dogs Trust has been in discussions with several local authorities who are implementing amnesties for pit bull-type dogs, including attending a recent meeting held by Merseyside police and attended by all six local authorities in Merseyside, where the force confirmed an amnesty would be brought in on 22 nd January. Clarissa Baldwin, Dogs Trust Chief Executive, said: “It is really worrying as we are seeing a similar situation to what happened in the late 1980s, where legislation was rushed in as a knee-jerk reaction to hysterical media coverage of so-called dangerous dogs. It is essential that whatever action is taken has to be the best course in the long-term. Sadly, these amnesties will not tackle the problem as the policies remain fixated on a dog’s breed, rather than its deed. Until we bring in effective controls for dog owners of all breeds based on a dog’s behaviour, and put resources into enforcing this, some reprehensible owners will continue to encourage aggression in their dogs, while innocent dogs are destroyed simply because of their breed. We must keep calling for a thoughtful review of the law itself.” Over the last two weeks Dogs Trust has also seen a marked increase in the number of dogs abandoned and handed over to its rehoming centres, with particularly large numbers of Staffordshire Bull Terriers. Staff are particularly saddened by this as many dogs have been loving and beloved family pets for years. Dogs Trust is urging dog owners not to panic that their dog will suddenly become aggressive, and has issued guidance for anyone concerned about their dog’s behaviour.
Breed Legislation in the News
4 Responses
Paul White
February 28th, 2007 at 12:10 am
1Hi there
Any dog biting a person should be treated very seriously.
However, while all hype, which is being whipped up by the media - ‘cos there short of news - must be taken with a pinch of salt.
I own a Rotti and a Japanese Akita - what happened to me after the Rotti attack at the Pub, (which was on the tv) - I went for my usual morning walk - unbelievably the dog warden was waiting for me.
He said there had been a complaint about my Rotti - for attacking a golden labrador - I was dumb founded because he’d not attacked any dog. And, apparently the other dog didn’t suffer any damage.
So my point is that also people lie about these things - just to bring some enjoyment in there sad miserable lifes.
Regards
Paul White
ben senot
February 13th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
2hello there
i was just arrested for walking my staffordshire in the park at 6:30 pm on 13/02/08. the police have came up to me and a friend ands started searching us for no reson wat so ever ( becouse we are 19 and live in london we get stoped and searched about 2-3 times a day for doing nafing at all) after nafing was found the police started to say my dog looks like a pit-bull altho my dog is a full staff but they just looked for a reson to arrest us (becouse the police officer gets a boness for every arrest now so they try to arrest u for anything they can) so me and the dog got arrested i stayd the hole night in a cell (i am not a criminal i have been arrested before but never convicted of anything. i do live in london and i dont know anyone over 16 who have not been arrested before in london). now the police have charged me with section 1 of the dangerous dogs act 1991 and kept the dog ( i bet the police officer got a nice payday) and they sayd i have to go to court on the 21/02/08 and the dog going to be put down. i have asked for other police officers to check my dog becouse its a staff (it realy is a just a staff) but the police have told me the police officer that arrested me can tall a dog just by lookin at it so it was my word against the police officer. now my dog is 14 months and his nee high but becouse its still young its not so full like a gorwn staff would look like, and that is what the police tell me a staff should look like a squire box . its fully traind (but not to attack) i have done my best to make my dog as friendly as it can be.my dog have never bit anyone or even showd his teeth before it was on a lead at all time and even the police officer sayd its friendly but he dont care what will happen the the dog he just wonts his pay. i realy dont know what to do im scread the dog going to be put down for some extra cash. i have lost my dog before and somebudy handed him to the poilce but i got it bk from them with no problem wat so ever becouse its a staff but now becouse a police officer thinks its pittbull it makes it so….. can someone please tell me what can i do to get him bk please email me whit any imfo to senot2002@hotmail.com
Alison Green
February 14th, 2008 at 2:33 am
3Hi Ben,
I will email you directly.
Do NOT sign your dog over at this time. You do NOT have to have your dog destroyed. No one bar a judge can order your dog to be destroyed. Even the police cannot do it without your agreement. You need to get a good solicitor (I can recommend one in your area) . Will be in touch.
Regards,
Alison Green.
sarah
March 21st, 2008 at 1:59 pm
4Even if you do own a pitbull type dog, you can fight it through the courts and you can probably agree to ensure that the dog is neutred/spayed and that it will wear a muzzle and be on a leash in public.
If your dog is defininatly a staff then show them the paperwork, and make sure that the vet can confirm this.
easy peasy.
This country is taking the piss, i think they have a lot more IMPORTANT matters to be dealing with, rather than stopping you and seizing your dog!
Its down right out of order, i think for one the dangerous dogs act has to be one of the most stupid laws invented, unfortunatly they have biased against certain breeds just because of size and power.
They have not seemed to look at the actual breed, and been able to look at the gentle, loyal, and definataltly friendly nature that they really have.
The goverment as usual, has just jumped into things neck first. not that this is unusual.
Its a shame, as these dogs can be such great pets and now because of the media portraying them as big dangerous man eating monsters… people seem to be believing them.
It is not the dog or the breed, but the way humans have treated them and bought them up. It only takes one idiot, and everything can go pear-shaped
I for one would be more scared of the evil little hamsters!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Sign up for our free dog advice newsletter and also receive a free trial issue of digital dog magazine
Categories
Recently Added
Dog Training Discussion
Useful Websites
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
Stop Dog Attacks is published by K9 Media Ltd in partnership with K9 Magazine | Sitemap |